How to recover an unpaid B2B invoice in Hungary

To recover an unpaid B2B invoice in Hungary, a creditor with a written contract typically moves through a formal demand, then either a payment order procedure or a European Payment Order, and – if the debtor still does not pay – an ordinary civil claim followed by enforcement against assets located in Hungary.

When this route applies and when it does not

This sequence fits a straightforward commercial dispute: a supply contract, an invoice with agreed payment terms, and a Hungarian debtor who has simply not paid. It assumes the goods or services were delivered and accepted, and that the debtor has not raised a genuine dispute about quality, quantity or scope. Most unpaid B2B invoices between businesses fall into this category, which is why the payment order route exists in the first place – it is built for claims that are clear on paper.

It does not fit every file. If the debtor disputes the underlying contract, denies delivery, or claims a set-off against a separate debt, the case stops being a payment claim and becomes a contested civil action from the outset. If insolvency proceedings have already opened against the debtor in Hungary, the individual claim is suspended and the creditor must join the collective process instead of pursuing it alone. And if the contract names a court or arbitration seat outside Hungary, the creditor's first decision is not procedural but jurisdictional – where the claim belongs before anything else is decided.

A creditor holding an invoice, a signed order confirmation or delivery documents, and no response after a written demand, is in the position this guide is written for.

The sequence, stage by stage

What drives the cost and the time

Three things move the file faster or slower, and each is a decision point, not a fixed variable. Whether the debtor objects to the payment order decides whether the case stays administrative or becomes full litigation – a contested file is a different budget from an uncontested one. Whether the debtor has identifiable, unencumbered assets in Hungary decides whether enforcement is quick or drawn out; a judgment against a debtor with nothing to seize is a piece of paper, not a recovery. And whether the claim carries a written contract with clear payment terms decides how much needs to be proven at each stage.

Statutory interest on the overdue amount accrues from the due date and forms part of what is claimed, though the applicable rate and its exact mechanics are confirmed against the current legal text before a claim is filed rather than assumed from a previous file. The same applies to court fees and enforcement costs: they scale with the amount claimed and the stage reached, and a creditor should ask for the specific figures against their invoice rather than budget from a general rule. What can be said in general terms is that the earlier a genuine dispute is identified, the cheaper the file stays – late-discovered disputes are the expensive kind.

The decision point: continue or stop

After the formal demand and a first read of the debtor's response – or silence – the creditor has enough information to decide whether to escalate. Silence with a clear, undisputed invoice usually justifies moving to the payment order procedure. A written objection raising a real dispute on the merits usually means the creditor is now assessing litigation risk, not a routine collection file, and should treat it that way before spending more on it.

This is also the point to check the debtor's actual condition, not just its paperwork. A debtor showing signs of financial distress changes the calculation: recovering a judgment against a company that is about to become insolvent is a different exercise from recovering against one that is simply slow to pay, and the risk profile of a Hungarian debtor becoming insolvent should be weighed before committing to a full litigation track. Where the amount at stake and the visible asset position both support it, engaging a Hungarian lawyer for the payment order or the litigation step is the next concrete action, and the practical process for doing that sits in the guide on debt recovery in Hungary.

When to stop

Three conditions mean the file should stop before it costs more than it can return. The debtor has no traceable assets in Hungary and none abroad that a Hungarian judgment could reach – a judgment with nothing behind it is not a recovery, it is a filing fee spent. Insolvency proceedings have opened against the debtor and the claim now competes with other creditors in a collective process where an individual enforcement step adds cost without adding priority. Or the sum in dispute is small enough that the cost of litigation and enforcement, even estimated conservatively, is close to or above what would actually be recovered.

None of these conditions are permanent – an asset position can change, and a debtor who has nothing today may have something in a year. But they are the honest stop signal, and a creditor deciding whether to keep spending on a file should check the arithmetic before the next invoice for legal work arrives, not after. Running the numbers against a specific claim, rather than a general rule, is what a debt recovery cost calculator is for.

Common questions

Can I recover a B2B invoice in Hungary without going to court?

Yes, if the debt is undisputed. The payment order procedure runs through a notary rather than a court and is designed for exactly this situation. It only turns into court litigation if the debtor formally objects.

How long does court recovery take in Hungary?

It depends on whether the debtor contests the claim and how the court's caseload is running at the time. An uncontested payment order moves considerably faster than a fully litigated case with an appeal. Any specific timeframe should be confirmed for the file rather than assumed in advance.

Does the European Payment Order apply against a Hungarian debtor?

It applies where the claim is cross-border within the EU and uncontested in substance. Whether to use it instead of the domestic payment order depends on where enforcement will actually happen, which is worth deciding before filing rather than after.

An unpaid invoice sitting with a Hungarian customer does not get cheaper to recover by waiting, and the harder cost is usually the wrong route chosen before anyone checked whether the debtor actually had anything to enforce against. The file above is built to make that check early, not late, and to stop the moment it stops making sense.

Request an assessment

By Eleanor Harlow